From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 14 22:41:57 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA16953 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 May 1995 22:41:57 -0700 Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA16943 ; Sun, 14 May 1995 22:41:53 -0700 Received: from cc.uq.oz.au by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au id <21745-0@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au>; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:41:25 +1000 Received: from netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au by pandora.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.10/DEVETIR-E0.3a) with ESMTP id PAA02362; Mon, 15 May 1995 15:45:20 +1000 Received: from localhost by netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.8.1/DEVETIR-0.1) id FAA04608; Mon, 15 May 1995 05:42:11 GMT Message-Id: <199505150542.FAA04608@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6 4/21/95 To: Jeffrey Hsu cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: IP version 6 implementation In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 May 1995 21:08:59 MST." <199505150408.VAA13527@freefall.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 15:42:10 +1000 From: Stephen Hocking Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Just out of the blue, do any of the specs allow for redundant > physical link layers w/ tcp/ip? That is, I have two ethernets to > one machine, w/ one IP address, and if the low level driver detects > a link failure on one ethernet, packets automatically get routed > to the other ethernet. Good question, unfortunately the paper I had lying around on it has been borrowed by an interested party. I think what we sould do is get in contact with the guy in France and ask him if we can use his work (which runs under NetBSD on a sparc) Stephen I do not speak for the Worker's Compensation Board of Queensland - They don't pay me enough for that!