From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 17:37:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F53FD01A92 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346BB16FE for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v27Hbt15079923 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:37:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214400] ports/head/base/binutils (r421584) targeting powerpc64: cross build failed for lack of finding a "gcc" command Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:37:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markmi@dsl-only.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:37:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214400 --- Comment #8 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #7) I do not expect that ports/head/base is intended to be used for TARGET_ARCH's that have well working system-clang support. (Although likely it should work even if those with well-working system-clang's are not what drives the need for ports/head/base .) Possibly a different target environment would be of more general interest. But for me it was powerpc64 (and powerpc) that was of interest because of lack of sufficient support by the system clang compilers/toolchain and I have access to such hardware. The README: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/base/README?revision=3D421582&view=3D= markup uses sparc64 an example. But I have no sparc64 systems to test build results on. I do have access to powerpc64 and powerpc examples. everything else that I have access to has working system-clang support and would not need ports/head/base to be used. In case is helps avoid future confusions: this was a amd64 -> powerpc64 cross build attempt. The actual execution environment was amd64 and powerpc64 was the target for the type of files to be produced but no actual powerpc64 processor was involved since things did not get far enough to have something to test on a powerpc64 system. In terms of my original wording: "base/binutils for my attempted powerpc64 cross build target [from amd64 . . ." Execution on amd64 is another reason for freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org being a questionable assignment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=