From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 25 20:24:06 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D785F106564A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from onemda@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7047E8FC20
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so3646774wwb.31
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
	:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=6efrvU4HwsTalAdWzggaRKFzN6GRv6wzfhP/K2kPH5w=;
	b=rKzJPmAtjDTeX0229qdqNZe2uTeGdehP5nB/UaAfpfKquVfvulMl9JvZ3K3IZajvJr
	Y1BkNd+ZKWkWD8CYoGYYwEpVkuh64qPDANNzP0zM4cp5IgFXtIOGFjb58q0e8vHhWEl1
	/8D9d3xAicNYIPeWdIKWVEnQhCVZfWa6RyD1w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=knQAXzatBCGbTbFEvMFvcS9/V9wX933nfNW8HD1bbUR0t7qlJ0urWj08+WWts+sO7u
	6HO0Sru2qzayMBdQmQ8FpGfMAMfqy/nTOe9NL2zafn6R0NyNyzJ0nKC4v7g8pm6oc2fD
	O7b9juYyCeIKmPfxQX2ydRkNaHwMo+Jeszc9I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.173.7 with SMTP id u7mr844876wel.50.1288038244856; Mon, 25
	Oct 2010 13:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.50.140 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4CC5D83E.8030505@delphij.net>
References: <4CC5D83E.8030505@delphij.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:04 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinpeTb2rO5gkaxjWPiws-XdR5+crEh5H17waZ-h@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
To: d@delphij.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kldload(8)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:24:06 -0000

On 10/25/10, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a simple patch that adds more meaning messages when kldload hits
> ENOEXEC.
>
> Before patch:
>
> kldload: can't load geom_eli.ko: Exec format error
>
> After patch:
>
> kldload: can't load geom_eli.ko: Exec format error
> kldload: Dependendent kernel module cannot be loaded from kern.module_path?
>
> Comments?

What about modules built for different __FreeBSD_version ?