From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Sep 28 21:55:18 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5BD9837B423; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 21:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 20DB11E012; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:54:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA17668;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id VAA10149;
	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 21:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200009290454.VAA10149@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: kris@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: telnet on freebsd 4.1.1
Cc: slawomir_szylko@internetia.pl, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 21:54:55 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2g/makemail 2.9a
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


This could be a new libc with an old (pre 4.1) kernel.  It often
kinda-works to upgrade your userland but not the kernel, but this
is an example of the kind of subtle breakage you can get with
mismatches.

  Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message