Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:24:36 -0700 From: aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mellanox 40Gb support Message-ID: <D37A0DFF-0CF2-43BD-B9F9-C9FE0AA70AF6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55D741FE.3090009@freebsd.org> References: <39463A45-148F-431E-9C75-87952B27033A@gmail.com> <CAHM0Q_M%2BnR-rtrX9NVMgHHka36U4cEJVrEayEA_qkoOnhTwUNQ@mail.gmail.com> <F632C05F-698B-43ED-B20B-CCE8D79E5658@gmail.com> <55D741FE.3090009@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Well, this is all in a test env of course, but I=92m planning to use = head. What are your thoughts? =20 - aurf "Janitorial Services" On Aug 21, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 8/21/15 10:29 PM, aurfalien wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Thanks very much for the response. >>=20 >> Well, I=92m implementing NFSoRDMA and as a best practices, Mellanox = suggested I use the very latest drivers. >>=20 >>=20 > really? > On FreeBSD? > Is this a fresh implementation of NFS or using the NFS in head? >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D37A0DFF-0CF2-43BD-B9F9-C9FE0AA70AF6>