Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:00:04 +0200 From: Kresimir Kumericki <kkumer@phy.hr> To: Keith Stevenson <k.stevenson@louisville.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd and tcp-wrappers Message-ID: <20000417150004.A2376@phy.hr> In-Reply-To: <20000417082136.C95086@osaka.louisville.edu>; from k.stevenson@louisville.edu on Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 08:21:36AM -0400 References: <20000417122732.A1826@phy.hr> <20000417082136.C95086@osaka.louisville.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (17 Apr 08:21), Keith Stevenson wrote: > The ports version of TCP Wrappers looks for its files in /usr/local/etc. [...] > The base system version of TCP Wrappers uses the files in /etc. Uh yes. I should have guessed that. Now I symlinked /etc/hosts.allow to /usr/local/etc/hosts.allow and it works fine. Thanks. That leaves only the question why is it stated in hosts.allow that "wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea." Maybe TCP wrappers before worked only with inetd and you don't want to start sshd from inetd because of key generation so this is some kind relic from that time or something? Just guessing. -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Kresimir Kumericki kkumer@phy.hr http://www.phy.hr/~kkumer/ Theoretical Physics Department, University of Zagreb, Croatia ------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000417150004.A2376>