From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 05:29:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BCC16A4D0; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:29:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA9543D48; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:28:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.12.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i09DSvHV087733; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:28:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)i09DSv8c087730; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:28:57 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:28:57 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Lev Serebryakov In-Reply-To: <853399522.20040109160326@serebryakov.spb.ru> Message-ID: <20040109152725.D32387-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: Mark Murray Subject: Re[2]: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:29:01 -0000 On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Doug! > Thursday, January 8, 2004, 8:29:34 PM, you wrote: > > DR> 3. Converting the repository. This is a tricky one - I tried the > DR> current version of the migration scripts and they barfed and died > DR> pretty quickly. Still, I'm pretty sure that the svn developers > DR> are planning to fix most of those problems. From mailing-list > DR> archives, it appears that they are using our cvs tree as test > DR> material for the migration scripts. > Did you try my (pure-perl) vatinat ``RefineCVS''? > > http://lev.serebryakov.spb.ru/refinecvs/refinecvs-0.76.783.tar.gz > > But, please, read documentation carefully before reporting bugs -- > many errors could be avoided with command-line options, sctipy is > paranoid by default. > > Some parts of FreeBSD repository could not be converted, because > contains revisions like 1.2.1 and other `I don't know what I should > think about this' errors. If you have some good ideas -- let me know > :) > Huh? Whats wrong with revision 1.2.1 ? This is perfectly normal cvs revision number, even if you have to use a command line option to get it. But it should not require any kind of special treatment. > -- > Lev Serebryakov >