Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:53:22 +0100 From: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Change to /sys/net/if.c & /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c Message-ID: <37BD6BE2.6FE8231C@baker.ie> References: <25881.935155785@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > + log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n", > > + ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit); > > You're the second person other than me to request this. :-) Yes, i've seen it suggested before alright.. > So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous > "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts? I don't have any objections, so developers speak up and have your say !! apart from the tun0 problem that I described in previous messages the suggested change seems to work perfectly.. - Cillian PS: any thoughts on the other vapourware idea :P ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37BD6BE2.6FE8231C>