From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 15 12:17:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819616A4B3
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9AC43FEA
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h9FJHMrq029775;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:17:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:17:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031015150836.T30029-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10310151516140.29179-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: More ULE bugs fixed.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:17:28 -0000

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >
> > > I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
> > > outside of Giant.  ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
> > > stopped it from working very well.
> > >
> > > Things should be much improved.  Feedback, as always, is welcome.  I'd
> > > like to look into making this the default scheduler for 5.2 if things
> > > start looking up.  I hope that scares you all into using it more. :-)
> >
> > Before you do that, can you look into changing the scheduler
> > interfaces to address David Xu's concern with it being
> > suboptimal for KSE processes?
> 
> Certainly, it may not happen if I can't find out what's making things so
> jerky for gnome/kde users.  If it looks like it will, I'll investigate the
> kse issues.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

-- 
Dan Eischen