From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 14 09:59:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19388 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 09:59:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19383 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 09:59:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA02021; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 09:58:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Nicolas Souchu cc: John Fieber , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Chuck Robey , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lpt0 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 Feb 1999 18:23:34 +0100." <19990214182334.03812@breizh.prism.uvsq.fr> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 09:58:39 -0800 Message-ID: <2017.919015119@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 07:36:37PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > >FWIW, I would also like to see this happen. > > What's the deadline? I did it for -current this day. I'm waiting for > some feedback before the 3.1 replica. Actually, subsequent discussions with Dag-Erling have sort of shown this to have been rather too ambitious of me and now I've major second thoughts. :( I think the number of changes involved in making the cut-over are just too likely to hang us at the last minute, and that's nothing any of us want. Any there any last cosmetic tie-ups of a less scary nature, or are we good to go as-is in the 3.0 branch? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message