Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:29:11 -0700
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
Cc:        Free BSD <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Mountroot problems on RPi3/aarch64
Message-ID:  <3108CA8F-55B4-461C-9CFA-7F80BD88A85D@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <47AFE262-8425-4A4D-A425-41CF39AA381E@yahoo.com>
References:  <20220601154142.GA41835@www.zefox.net> <5FA108CF-0973-4A53-A3B7-FA7BE41EB16D@yahoo.com> <20220601214401.GA42494@www.zefox.net> <20220602045202.GA44686@www.zefox.net> <1B845A0C-EDDC-407C-96A8-AAF4E92C2A4D@yahoo.com> <20220613153325.GA12588@www.zefox.net> <50CE21C4-CBE5-4ECB-A27E-42B7AAF71822@yahoo.com> <CE0A908C-EFF3-455D-B303-BCC56C95EAB1@yahoo.com> <20220619042225.GA2267@www.zefox.net> <3458F90E-CFC9-4B91-8C4A-DD5788239172@yahoo.com> <20220621192448.GA1874@www.zefox.net> <54365257-9DA2-4058-9354-B5D76E7AAC70@yahoo.com> <47AFE262-8425-4A4D-A425-41CF39AA381E@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, there is another check-in, but this time it is
a fix to growfs:.

=
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main/2022-June/007525.h=
tml

shows:

Kirk McKusick <mckusick_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 04:48:39 UTC=20
The branch main has been updated by mckusick:

URL: =
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D2049cc3218151f8d4108d878196905c3=
4bbf15bc

commit 2049cc3218151f8d4108d878196905c34bbf15bc
Author:     Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2022-06-28 04:46:15 +0000
Commit:     Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2022-06-28 04:48:24 +0000

    Correctly update fs_dsize in growfs(8)
   =20
    When growing a UFS/FFS filesystem, the size of the summary =
information
    may expand into additional blocks. These blocks must be removed from
    fs_dsize which records the number of blocks in the filesystem that =
can
    be used to hold filesystem data.
   =20
    While here also update the fs_old_dsize and fs_old_size fields for
    compatibility with kernels that were compiled before the addition
    of UFS2.
   =20
    Reported by: Edward Tomasz Napiera
    MFC after:   1 week
. . .


Unfortunately, testing this looks like it would be going back
through your sequence/usage pattern that lead to the problem,
to see if it is avoided. It is not a way to fix an existing
UFS2/FFS problem.

=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3108CA8F-55B4-461C-9CFA-7F80BD88A85D>