From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 16:40:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C9D16A403 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 16:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout3.yahoo.com (mrout3.yahoo.com [216.145.54.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D65313C447 for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 16:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from 104.32.61.10.in-addr.arpa.neville-neil.com (proxy8.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.13]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id l4AGRkfl092227; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:34:31 -0700 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Oliver Fromme In-Reply-To: <200705101342.l4ADgCgg007728@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <200705101342.l4ADgCgg007728@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.0.95 (i386-apple-darwin8.8.2) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, wkoszek@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:40:23 -0000 At Thu, 10 May 2007 15:42:12 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme wrote: > > I think it would make sense to move lukemftpd to ports and > remove it from the base system. It might be worth noting > that lukemftp (the client) already is in ports. > > Well, in fact I'm not convinced that there has to be an > FTP daemon in the base system at all. But I guess it's not > possible to reach a consensus on removing all ftpds from > the base completely. > Getting to one would be a good move. Wojchiech, are you proposing a patch to do the removal? It would be good to see what you propose removing, just for safety sake. Best, George