Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Dec 2013 00:33:22 +0400
From:      Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com>
To:        Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se>, Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: The vim port needs a refresh
Message-ID:  <CAO8GK0qUXqKHn_AOfh5t17n=T=argkwD=TXSxjLc6gQJ4Qw8fQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo838TYb_AZmVAfmSDLBh6JstUgr=3Z=Y9EnA6kXVgBx1k=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <CADLo83_AgAH0fARvtoYYmw5UEf7%2B3nEEs6U%2B6%2BhY8r0MbTkWFw@mail.gmail.com> <51A09858.4060803@daemonic.se> <CADLo838TYb_AZmVAfmSDLBh6JstUgr=3Z=Y9EnA6kXVgBx1k=Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 May 2013 15:24, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 25 May 2013 11:54, Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se> wrote:
> > On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
> >>
> >> Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port????
> >
> > Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shells/bash) was converted to
> > optionsNG not too long ago.
>
> Ah, that's at least some good news.  I notice that it was on yet
> another maintainer timeout, so that criticism stands.
>
> It appears that David is no longer interested.


As I see it is not regular maintainer timeout as we hoped. May be really
David should be removed from maintainer list.

-- Eir Nym



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO8GK0qUXqKHn_AOfh5t17n=T=argkwD=TXSxjLc6gQJ4Qw8fQ>