Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:57:48 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/75551: [PATCH] Correct a 'post-patch' entry in the port's Makefile since a files/patch-* seems to do the same thing. Message-ID: <20041228215748.67ad5cc7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <1104262475.48118.17.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <200412281659.iBSGxciD076228@freefall.freebsd.org> <20041228211134.056bb9b3@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <1104261378.48118.11.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20041228213109.6ed4e952@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <1104262475.48118.17.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:34:35 +0100 Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=ED=B9e v =FAt 28. 12. 2004 v 21:31 +0200: >=20 > > > Second, I fear that those PRs would be forgotten in analyzed state on= ce > > > the port is updated and the matter settled. So I rather closed them. > >=20 > > I try not to forget to say about the PRs that should be closed when my > > PRs supersede them. >=20 > Fair, I should have been more involved and track these PRs instead of > closing them. My apology. C'mon. You do more that enough work. If I have to use my agenda or my company bug handling system to gain you a few minutes, that I will do. Maybe someday, somehow I would have had (sorry, English verb times are still something I can't master no mater what I try :-( ) contributed enough to be a committer and then I could take acre of my own PRs, at least :) But why my aspell doesn't like the word 'committer' ? :)) > > > > > (Bottom line here is that you should approach maintainer directly, > > > > > without the detour via send-pr) > > > >=20 > > > > For two stylistic ones yes, but for the dir permissions (75549) and > > > > "UntrustedDeliveryAgent" and "QuarantineAgent (75548), I tend to > > > > believe a pr is OK. > > >=20 > > > Always, always, always, when there is an active maintainer around, > > > direct contact with a maintainer is strongly preferred. > > >=20 > > > It's really an ugly habit to send-pr patch and Cc maintainer. > >=20 > > Better that send pr and not cc the maintainer, anyway. >=20 > Yes that's worst variant. >=20 > > > First, a lot of maintainers don't know how to act properly on such > > > emails, they just don't Cc their replies back to GNATS. > >=20 > > I think the problem is that the subj, must begin with > > FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org or else it becomes a 'misfiled' reply. ^^^^^^^ I meant the 'to:' > > Only cc'ing seems not to be enough. >=20 > The trick is to leave Re: ports/XXXXX: at the beginning of the subject. Only ? I don't think I alter the subj.Anyway next time I'll make sure. --=20 IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041228215748.67ad5cc7>