From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 11:57:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE17C106564A; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051458FC16; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2171986fxm.13 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:57:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=g4opZijcveMX3Ti4ApMoUszrloilRLnGXuXOvjYhIgM=; b=VknrAv4+uAxsRuE3y4MSLPgh7UnBngsJNdFuEkNN/g0EQMCwD7uL4bfDBIBED9jVaM Ke0+oua5VbEQaodYFzS3KnFTy1PnAZ3OHrpmG45mrsiJs2Qe9gtKxNPon56HcA/zscCI aKbBi5SXwcxsJQSZXiRj46IIdF0uRRG2Kcw3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=TJfJRHk7nE/kl1i7ArLtOOw/4feHO7Z5CHsSMa6iW0US1i16cY+n3v0dArGir6xV0s aVxwvLv5XaJ6gX0tQAPKDl3L2RGSzSqwbctFXWsIlwjE3wHGqy/0rUldePmwqjI+IHgV LisGoa7mzazvgijpqqzzH/cU3NeWKsE8MQZyU= Received: by 10.223.86.140 with SMTP id s12mr787631fal.145.1296129442698; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ua1.etadirect.net [91.198.140.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm5933406fav.17.2011.01.27.03.57.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:57:20 -0800 (PST) From: Mikolaj Golub To: Bernhard Froehlich Organization: TOA Ukraine References: <86oc77heqk.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <4D3D2DE9.2060004@freebsd.org> <86tygwy9p0.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <4D3F8357.2070005@freebsd.org> <62fcd16074e526547c3417a8f259174e@bluelife.at> <8662tbkahz.fsf@zhuzha.ua1> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:57:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Bernhard Froehlich's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:19:57 +0100") Message-ID: <861v3yk19f.fsf@zhuzha.ua1> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox + VIMAGE X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:57:26 -0000 On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:19:57 +0100 Bernhard Froehlich wrote: BF> http://home.bluelife.at/patches/virtualbox-ose-kmod-devel-VIMAGE.diff BF> I've integrated it a bit better into the VirtualBox build system, added BF> the ports stuff and updated the patch for VirtualBox 4.0.2. Thanks! BF> It is currently unclear to me why you add VIMAGE to CFLAGS but nowhere BF> check for VIMAGE in VBoxNetFlt-freebsd.c. Shouldn't we add a check for BF> VIMAGE in the #if defined line or is this already done somewhere deep in BF> the included headers? All magic is in net/vnet.h :-) -- Mikolaj Golub