From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 12 03:18:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD99C7318C for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from stig.purplehat.org (stig.purplehat.org [50.243.134.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF05EE1A for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from localhost (bill.goatse.unfs.us [50.243.134.106]) by stig.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5265A889; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:18:56 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=unfs.us; s=mail; t=1481512736; bh=5u8/wRsyx7AoibScFheb51JCckNO3rhdOj7rngQFcbA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=oJduev5tHA1H2KYA3pg7UE8UGyTxweFbDWq9lozKDuV1BuldWEa9KuFcpxH5fy5Zu 04TJtlywAg/JindkEPYK+ZniINAJGrWfKMffl9VaftYtyPHFV5hVux8S2E39wV3Gkd kUoILysX9SMwkMui2g+bgOzP9onAC+R7ZwzEDZfM= Received: from stig.purplehat.org ([50.243.134.106]) by localhost (stig.purplehat.org [50.243.134.106]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43138-01; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:18:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.1.10.30] (unknown [10.1.10.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jankyj@unfs.us) by stig.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E269C5A87B; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:18:54 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=unfs.us; s=mail; t=1481512735; bh=5u8/wRsyx7AoibScFheb51JCckNO3rhdOj7rngQFcbA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FMbkPaJuBdNO/aUXNoAt6eiZFUzMyN3EgBRph6HqjMztgJYd5ZbOWeK0zNf+N4EI8 cYZM6AcDpLLIztYlQCQmYskDr5LVbn0hMVg+Dp4gUYUGkMkNv+/h06Ez6+1oBfeGy6 j19dpgbYkQhFWSQva1uo1cJSjioXf4IutTh80aho= Subject: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161208085926.GC2691@gmail.com> From: "Janky Jay, III" Message-ID: <570a8877-9e2f-a295-6f8a-5e5f441fe86b@unfs.us> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 20:18:44 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G7JewiSijQJLO2U5aooXTsRg6Qda163c7" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:18:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --G7JewiSijQJLO2U5aooXTsRg6Qda163c7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FLI5BtGHsm2OrFoJWBnjAbToh5COr9ngp"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Janky Jay, III" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <570a8877-9e2f-a295-6f8a-5e5f441fe86b@unfs.us> Subject: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues References: <20161208085926.GC2691@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: --FLI5BtGHsm2OrFoJWBnjAbToh5COr9ngp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vlad, On 12/11/2016 07:58 PM, Vlad K. wrote: > On 2016-12-12 03:42, Janky Jay, III wrote: >> This very, VERY rarely happens to me and I use ports *ONLY* in >> production environments. If you could please provide examples and repo= rt >> the issues to the port maintainer of the ports with issues, that would= >> greatly help this situation. (Please don't take this as an insult or >=20 > Good advice, but please rather file a bug report on our bugzilla: >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?component=3DIndividual%= 20Port%28s%29&product=3DPorts%20%26%20Packages >=20 >=20 > Problems reported to maintainers directly cannot be tracked or confirme= d > by other users. >=20 Thanks for the clarification. In my previous response, my recommendation was to report to both the port maintainer as well as file a BUG report. I should have been more clear. Regards, Janky Jay, III --FLI5BtGHsm2OrFoJWBnjAbToh5COr9ngp-- --G7JewiSijQJLO2U5aooXTsRg6Qda163c7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlhOFxUACgkQGK3MsUbJZn6pDgCfT8D103J/Nj68+luuCCaYWJYM J2EAnRKtPzXmMYoi1sCHjgbTdIhYvfzz =k95r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G7JewiSijQJLO2U5aooXTsRg6Qda163c7--