From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 14:30:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABD216A41F for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A77043D5D for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j71EUPsx046557 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j71EUP8g046554; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:30:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:30:25 GMT Message-Id: <200508011430.j71EUP8g046554@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: docs/84265: chmod(1) manpage omits implication of setting w on directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:30:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/84265; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/84265: chmod(1) manpage omits implication of setting w on directory Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:25:43 +0300 On 2005-08-01 07:18, "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > BTW, I forgot that you might just be commenting on the PR and it might > not be assigned to you (yet?). Unless I hear otherwise, I'll just > forget about it for a while and see later whether I need to do more > with it, like write (small?) patches for chown & chgrp, which I'm now > thinking should probably refer to this rather extensive explanation in > chmod. Unless you think it needn't be mentioned anywhere else. Sounds like a nice plan :-)