Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:28:49 +0100
From:      Andre Wensing <andre@wensing.org>
To:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   INDEX has lower version of ports than installed ones
Message-ID:  <4921C5F1.8070906@wensing.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Does anyone know if INDEX has been updated recently? For some reason 
`pkg_version -IvL =` reports me that I've got newer ports than INDEX has:

server# pkg_version -IvL =
amavisd-new-2.6.1_1,1               >   succeeds index (index has 2.6.1,1)
cyrus-sasl-2.1.22_2                 >   succeeds index (index has 2.1.22_1)
cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.22_1       >   succeeds index (index has 2.1.22)
dcraw-8.88                          >   succeeds index (index has 8.86)
dirmngr-1.0.2                       >   succeeds index (index has 1.0.1_2)
dovecot-1.1.3_1                     >   succeeds index (index has 1.1.3)
mysql-client-5.0.67_1               >   succeeds index (index has 5.0.67)
mysql-server-5.0.67_1               >   succeeds index (index has 5.0.67)
pcre-7.8                            >   succeeds index (index has 7.7_1)
postfix-2.5.5,1                     >   succeeds index (index has 2.5.4,1)
rrdtool-1.3.3                       >   succeeds index (index has 1.3.1)
squirrelmail-1.4.16                 >   succeeds index (index has 1.4.15_1)


server# uname -a
FreeBSD server.home.local 6.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-PRERELEASE #6: Wed 
Sep 24 06:04:20 CEST 2008 
root@server.home.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

How can this be? The ports-tree has thawed, right (at least, according 
to the release-schedule for 6.4)?

I hope someone knows the answer...


André



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4921C5F1.8070906>