From owner-freebsd-smp  Sat Apr  5 22:15:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA27064
          for smp-outgoing; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 22:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail0.iij.ad.jp (mail0.iij.ad.jp [202.232.2.113])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA27058
          for <smp@freebsd.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 22:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp2.iij.ad.jp (uucp2.iij.ad.jp [202.232.2.202]) by mail0.iij.ad.jp (8.8.5+2.7Wbeta5/3.5Wpl4-MAIL) with SMTP id PAA06103; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 15:15:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp2.iij.ad.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.3W9-UUCP) with UUCP id PAA11933; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 15:15:13 +0900
Received: from tyd1.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp (tyd1.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp [192.168.1.2]) by tydfam.iijnet.or.jp (8.8.5/3.4W2-uucp) with ESMTP id KAA13052; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 10:22:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp (localhost.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp [127.0.0.1]) by tyd1.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp (8.8.5/3.4Wnomx) with SMTP id KAA00429; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 10:22:24 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199704060122.KAA00429@tyd1.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp>
X-Authentication-Warning: tyd1.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp: localhost.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: peter@spinner.dialix.com
Cc: dfr@nlsystems.com, smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Any chance of sync with current? 
Reply-To: ken@tydfam.iijnet.or.jp
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 05 Apr 1997 23:53:47 +0800"
References: <199704051553.XAA17993@spinner.DIALix.COM>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.55 on Emacs 19.34.2, Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 1997 10:22:24 +0900
From: Takeshi Yamada <ken@tyd1.tydfam.iijnet.or.jp>
Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

  I really appreciate if it is merged into -current tree which is now
working without any significant problem at least with my machine ASUS
P/I-P6NP5.  
  And if you wait a month or so, the kernel part of -current tree might 
become messy again with modular kernel thing which sounds to me under 
discussion with very likely to happen.

  Again, I eagerly ask you to consider merging it to present -current
tree.

Regards,