From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 15:17:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDBA16A415 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF1C43D6B for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so960367wxd for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PTN6vdQOWDomrAUU4cOAYh2AyXF65TIdBsynFfrVRrd6o/kqA7eQpTnqgOlQQyCuDMbKbfS3Rz/kH+9gid7sr64RRQ6h8XqjTL93OschhZEXCiTQykfX3qKfzkjR0oxFN7iFKPAdJDfxzyAQ7NkyV9bTp9DKJ2j9gTmMZRrPf0c= Received: by 10.70.113.15 with SMTP id l15mr5297665wxc; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.118.3 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fd864e0609290816v7692e678vcca8ff89d24bbdac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:16:39 -0500 From: Astrodog To: "Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060929.091414.74722768.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060929134332.GD4776@rambler-co.ru> <20060929144738.W70454@fledge.watson.org> <2fd864e0609290707t7e7d6e17g61a09ff5aa10ff3f@mail.gmail.com> <20060929.091414.74722768.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lockf in installworld -- not a good idea X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:17:27 -0000 On 9/29/06, Warner Losh wrote: > > > For what its worth.... I'd go with just stopping support for -j in > > installworld, even if things are CPU bound. > > installworld should *NEVER* be done -j. Ever. That wasn't part of > the installworld bargin when it was started. There's no point to it > at all. As such, any support to make it work should be removed with > extreme prejustice. Why on earth would you want to do installworld > -j? That's kinda my thought. --- Harrison