From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Dec 26 07:10:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A2DEA62EC; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4794067E8B; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 879A21C4A3; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:10:36 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Yuri Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456674 - in head/graphics: . libQGLViewer libQGLViewer/files Message-ID: <20171226071036.GB27490@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712182143.vBILhFND023143@repo.freebsd.org> <20171224135522.GA1693@FreeBSD.org> <6fa2551a-dee7-9388-07fc-6539800b6c5a@freebsd.org> <20171225112028.GA61880@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:10:37 -0000 On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:56:09AM -0800, Yuri wrote: > On 12/25/17 03:20, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > "Official" names look good in documentation and port description, but not > > so as port's directory and PORTNAME. The fact that it was earlier named > > Yeah .... let's just disagree on that one. Again, this is not a merely matter of taste. You're breaking consistency, both with our own existing port names and other OS/distros repositories. It brings some minor, but annoying technical issues, e.g. due to different sorting order based on one's locale (collation rules); people now have to remember to call grep(1) with `-i' more often -- not that is wasn't a good idea before, but you're stretching the surface for potential errors and mistakes. For no sound, substantial, technical and/or usability benefits -- quite on the contrary sometimes, as eloquently noted in Tijl's email. Please take some time and think about it as a software engineer working on a large project with huge number of ports, and a member of large community. ./danfe