From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 16 05:36:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA28811 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dada.kaizen.net (dada.kaizen.net [206.27.236.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA28803 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 05:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mnewell@localhost) by dada.kaizen.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA11326; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 08:32:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: dada.kaizen.net: mnewell owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 08:32:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Newell To: Joe Greco cc: Chris Shenton , hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routed supports variable-length netmasks? In-Reply-To: <199608151738.MAA14144@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 Aug 1996, Joe Greco wrote: > I use static routing around here with no problems. I found static routes to be a problem. If the ppp link goes down and a packet arrives it redirects the route out throught he default; when the link comes back up it doesn't get re-re-directed. :-( What we were trying to do is use the /etc/ppp/ip-up and /etc/ppp/ip-down to install static routes, but route won't work for non-root logins. :-( I remember something about this on the list, but I've not had a chance to research it. :-(!! But gated is clearly the way to go. I don't know if it's all that important to run OSPF, but certainly RIPv2 is basic. Thanks, Mike