From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  1 09:05:04 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BD1106564A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 09:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
	[IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0B28FC08
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2009 09:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5194v4G029933;
	Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:04:57 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id
	n5194vfR029930; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:04:57 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:04:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <442651299CA2445991E65F64AF9E65D7@uk.tiscali.intl>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906011103160.29890@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <20090530175239.GA25604@logik.internal.network><20090530144354.2255f722@bhuda.mired.org><20090530191840.GA68514@logik.internal.network><20090530162744.5d77e9d1@bhuda.mired.org><A5BB2D2B836A4438B1B7BD8420FCC6A3@uk.tiscali.intl><20090531201445.GA82420@logik.internal.network><alpine.BSF.2.00.0905312355240.26545@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl><0229B3BF1BE94C82AA11FD06CBE0BDEF@uk.tiscali.intl><20090531235943.GA77374@logik.internal.network><20090531201408.45dd4334@bhuda.mired.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0906010224050.27329@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<442651299CA2445991E65F64AF9E65D7@uk.tiscali.intl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org,
	'Mike Meyer' <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org>,
	xorquewasp@googlemail.com
Subject: RE: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:05:04 -0000

> You shouldn't need to alter the copies attribute to recover from disk
> failures as the normal raid should take care of that. What the copies is

I don't think we understand each other. I say that when i want 2 copies, 
ZFS should rebuild second copy if it's gone and i run resilver.

it does not, what doesn't make sense for me.