From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 15 13:13:45 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFFD37B422; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13a1rd-0006fI-00; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:13:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:13:37 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: Rajesh Vaidheeswarran Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/cons-test Makefile ports/devel/cons-test/files md5 ports/devel/cons-test/pkg COMMENT DESCR MESSAGE PLIST Message-ID: <20000915151337.C84360@FreeBSD.org> References: <200009152009.QAA10133@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200009152009.QAA10133@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com>; from rv@freebsd.org on Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:09:55PM -0400 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:09:55PM -0400, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote: > If so, this package is different. This is not a development version of > cons. It actually is a test bed that cons developers can use to do > regression testing of cons whenever they add new features. > > Does that make the name valid? What's wrong with cons-testbed, then? One doesn't always have to follow the philosophy of spelling "terse", "trs". In addition, since there's no history to the port, it can easily be trashed and re-added as cons-testbed. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message