From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 28 22:08:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC0416A4CE; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6803543D49; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:08:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (24-161-166-146.san.rr.com [24.161.166.146]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D611005B2; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:08:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.COM To: Colin Percival Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:08:12 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <6.1.0.6.1.20040427094029.03d3d218@popserver.sfu.ca> <200404281014.49691.wes@softweyr.com> <6.1.0.6.1.20040428181623.03cd6ae8@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.1.20040428181623.03cd6ae8@popserver.sfu.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404282208.12326.wes@softweyr.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 05:02:06 -0700 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Alex Dupre Subject: Re: Removing NOCRYPT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 05:08:13 -0000 On Wednesday 28 April 2004 10:18, Colin Percival wrote: > At 18:14 28/04/2004, Wes Peters wrote: > >Many embedded CPUs are not well suited to software cryto. Colin seems > > to have forgotten just how many people ship (sometimes very small) > > subsets of FreeBSD and need a way to squeeze unused code out of libc et > > al. > > Ok, I had forgotten that. Can I assume that anyone who needs to save > space like that is going to be building everything themself? Yes, or they won't get the savings. > I don't really mind leaving NOCRYPT in the source tree as long as we > get it out of the releases. A wise choice. Thanks for your contributions, you're doing great work, and thanks again for being so agreeable about all this. ;^) -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com