From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 18:57:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DF916A4CE; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:57:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5786943D2F; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marks@dell-laptop.6bone.nl) Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id A34864EC2D; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:49:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306C84E3BF; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:49:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dell-laptop.6bone.nl (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by birch.ripe.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with SMTP id i62Gng4c010783; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:49:42 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 44953 invoked by uid 1001); Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:49:42 -0000 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:49:42 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040702164942.GP779@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.000000 / 0.0 / 0.0 / disabled X-RIPE-Signature: 298d3a55eb9597a4c8ee87079ec070e4 cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 18:57:36 -0000 On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Mark Santcroos writes: > > Any idea why I'm not seeing it? > > Because you're not building with -O2, like you should. I'm confused now... >From make.conf(5): " CFLAGS (str) Controls the compiler setting when compiling C code. Optimization levels above -O (-O2, ...) are not supported. " Mark