Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:46:46 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r383978 - head/multimedia/handbrake Message-ID: <20150414074646.GA29265@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150414073653.GH1017@f10.opsec.eu> References: <201504140613.t3E6D48n077306@svn.freebsd.org> <20150414062552.GA1692@FreeBSD.org> <20150414073653.GH1017@f10.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:36:53AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > multimedia/handbrake: fix X11_DESC > > > > It's very unfortunate that handbrake become gtk3-only; two questions > > in this regard: > > > > - does it still support gtk20 gui, and > > I did not investigate this. I was not aware that there's a debate/policy > to keep gtk20 alive. Is there one ? Where can I read more about it ? You mean, a policy to keep gtk3 alive? :) Not sure, I'd let it die, but not everyone agrees unfortunately. gtk20 obviously is staying. Seriously though, gtk20 is being far better than gtk3 ATM. gtk3 is slow and crappy, and just one major regression compared to gtk20 (with a few exceptions like touch devices support). Some projects that had switched to gtk3 at first later regret this decision and returned under gtk20 sanity. > > - if yes, shouldn't it be an OPTION? > > Given that the port is unmaintained, someone needs to find out. Can > you open a PR ? I'll have a look and either fix it or file a PR. > > > -X11_DESC= Build GTK+2 based GUI program > > > +X11_DESC= Build GTK3 based GUI program > > > > Where did plus sign go? Please respect official project names. It is > > still GTK+ per what I read at their website [1]. > > It's back with the next commit. Seen it, thanks! ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150414074646.GA29265>