From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Sep 8 18:36:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA12230 for emulation-outgoing; Sun, 8 Sep 1996 18:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA12224 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 1996 18:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id SAA03312 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 1996 18:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id LAA26166; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:02:49 +0930 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199609090132.LAA26166@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: X required for doscmd? To: sam@wa4phy.async.com (S.W. Drinkard) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:02:48 +0930 (CST) Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199609072105.RAA00194@wa4phy.async.com> from "S.W. Drinkard" at Sep 7, 96 05:05:21 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk S.W. Drinkard stands accused of saying: > > Looking at the last few notes about doscmd, I kinda gather that X is > required for use. Is that the case, or does it work without X? X is required for 'fullscreen' emulation. Alexy just posted some diffs that will let you compile doscmd without needing X installed, but bear in mind that any program that attempts BIOS screen output will die. > -sam- -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[