Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:44:49 -0400 From: Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net> To: bsd@todoo.biz, Liste FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Housing solution based on FreeBSD + ZFS + Jails Message-ID: <C6428FACAE96EEA0DB45AABB@[192.168.1.50]> In-Reply-To: <41174CC5-915D-4409-AE86-379FF7ED7059@todoo.biz> References: <490BD842-8800-4566-A181-776BF5091D62@todoo.biz> <9E5D3344CB17323C1D903452@[192.168.1.50]> <41174CC5-915D-4409-AE86-379FF7ED7059@todoo.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--As of May 8, 2014 6:08:00 PM +0200, bsd@todoo.biz is alleged to have said: > Thank you for your answers. > We are using EZJail on a daily basis with ZFS mapping so this is > something we have expertise with. > > One critical point will be the need for IP addresses in order to have > dedicated IPs per jail. Has anyone been working around this problem ? --As for the rest, it is mine. Still just throwing out ideas: Have the management solution set up a jail (or the host OS) running pf with NAT, if you want them to share an IP address. If you can run pf in a jail, you could even do things like assign one IP per customer. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. ---------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6428FACAE96EEA0DB45AABB>