From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 04:54:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFEC16A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB42243D46; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80047D8C; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:54:42 -0500 (EST) References: <20060103155509.GE13887@poupinou.org> <200601100934.54698.jhb@freebsd.org> <200601101626.11902.jhb@freebsd.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: John Baldwin Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:54:42 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Nate Lawson , Ariff Abdullah Subject: Re: No APM yet for AMD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:54:44 -0000 John Baldwin writes: > Eh? You do realize that right now all I have is '-1' I am totally lost... What is wrong with Ariff's patch? http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/acpi/acpiconf.c.diff State: charging Present rate: unknown Remaining capacity: 62% Voltage: unknown AC line: on-line > charging rate and the remaining time to full charge, etc.) but it would give > a somewhat decent estimate that would basically be based on what your usage > was in the last sample time. OK. I understand better now. Would this be more accurate than Ariff's patch?