Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:47:27 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> To: Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> Cc: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>, Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, <net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102091644260.85718-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10102091721400.31680-100000@spider.pilosoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Chris Dillon wrote: > > > Cool, if thats all it will take, I'll give it a try. But, whatever > > method Compaq/Intel is using doesn't require me to set up the ports on > > the switch as being part of a trunk. It "just works". And IIRC, when > > Its not real trunking. Your incoming traffic will still come on a > single link, only outbound traffic will be shared. (Or at least > that's how I think compaq stuff will work). Yes, I think that is how it works. I'd guess that this doesn't matter in most cases since most servers are transmitting much more data than they are receiving. -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet. For IA32 and Alpha architectures. IA64, PPC, and ARM under development. http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.32.0102091644260.85718-100000>