Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:15:17 -0700 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Event channel Interrupts and unified Xen interrupt infrastructure. Message-ID: <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <7D29BB74-2341-4164-B2B8-85A4CAB3A6CE@FreeBSD.org> References: <7D29BB74-2341-4164-B2B8-85A4CAB3A6CE@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/29/13 09:32, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > I've been working to get the next chunk of Spectra/Roger Pau Monné Xen work into head. The latest version of the patch I'm working on can be found here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_intr.diff > > I will continue my testing today and commit it tonight unless I hear complaints. Comments, corrections, improvements, and bug reports welcome. Could this patch be split into functional and non-functional components? It's distracting having everything mixed up together in a single megapatch. Even committing the s/unlikely/__predict_false/ separately would help. How do you intend to have Xen HVM work in the GENERIC kernel configuration? Will you be adding 'options XENHVM' to GENERIC? -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521F9DC5.6040606>