From owner-cvs-all Tue May 21 2:35:15 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD96037B404; Tue, 21 May 2002 02:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g4L9Yu077446; Tue, 21 May 2002 12:34:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:34:56 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Mike Barcroft Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/elf2aout elf2aout.c Message-ID: <20020521093456.GA74330@sunbay.com> References: <200205200756.g4K7ueM28492@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020520125748.E8089@espresso.q9media.com> <20020521074034.GB53675@sunbay.com> <20020521042755.B56179@espresso.q9media.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020521042755.B56179@espresso.q9media.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:27:55AM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:57:48PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > > > ru 2002/05/20 00:56:40 PDT > > > >=20 > > > > Modified files: > > > > usr.bin/elf2aout elf2aout.c=20 > > > > Log: > > > > s/u_int/u_int32_t/ > > > > =20 > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > > 1.3 +9 -8 src/usr.bin/elf2aout/elf2aout.c > > >=20 > > > Can we take this a step further and use the proper spelling: > > > s/u_int32_t/uint32_t/ > > >=20 > > You'll have to fix first. Also make sure this > > still can be bootstrapped from the old versions. >=20 > Well it looks like the structure you changed is for aout information, > so I don't see how would be significant. But even if it > were, u_int32_t and uint32_t will always be compatible with each > other. The only difference being that the latter is portable, which > is a positive attribute for cross-tools. >=20 I know, I was trying to point that still uses an old non-portable u_int32_t, and probably should also be fixed. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE86hTAUkv4P6juNwoRAlPiAJ0UPvH7DWUAx+nln0dii14TMq/FVwCfRPiZ 8TNs+coVOHm+thSyWy4YL18= =f15q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message