From owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org  Wed Dec 30 11:33:57 2020
Return-Path: <owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5524BF22C;
 Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:33:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5Th45ty6z3FYh;
 Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:33:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by kib.kiev.ua (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0BUBXhL2017240
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:33:47 +0200 (EET)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua 0BUBXhL2017240
Received: (from kostik@localhost)
 by tom.home (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 0BUBXha0017239;
 Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:33:43 +0200 (EET)
 (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com
 using -f
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:33:43 +0200
From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To: Ryan Libby <rlibby@freebsd.org>
Cc: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>,
 src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>,
 dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-branches@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: git: 269b7d8ac1e5 - stable/12 - tftpd: tests: raise targeted
 cstd to c11
Message-ID: <X+xll6dRq38+lxnN@kib.kiev.ua>
References: <202012292306.0BTN6ivw093358@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
 <CACNAnaEoyoU4Caht1ZceUtSS3CAr-UG7O8amuEu_XpnzKQ8VBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHgpiFyQrDcNYV-5C6UB0wR6r_bpww4PobMBv_Hq15FT_kfN9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACNAnaEUCUB7A4AtsCefRpHNjSwkmsiTYvMWsEsYt8XBg3J10w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACNAnaEL7cKHD=dFexAuDRomQ6zXKH-Sgb2v3t6Ja6NSnE35+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHgpiFyJyHrSTfXTvZhkg5uUzbY0Yx_yCY3aL3Fc_Zphj=a+bQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACNAnaEJpoSyXOi+06ooyEZ6zyQX7tsMUEe+eoCkokheNNM6LQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHgpiFxd67vNzdqt+QWz7q2SwsDvJ4PSBMY=2Lpn-3fycggXhQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHgpiFxd67vNzdqt+QWz7q2SwsDvJ4PSBMY=2Lpn-3fycggXhQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,
 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on tom.home
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4D5Th45ty6z3FYh
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	 REPLY(-4.00)[]
X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Commit messages for all branches of the src repository."
 <dev-commits-src-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/dev-commits-src-all>, 
 <mailto:dev-commits-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/dev-commits-src-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-commits-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-all>, 
 <mailto:dev-commits-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:33:57 -0000

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 07:10:02PM -0800, Ryan Libby wrote:
> I checked amd64 and it failed due to pkru.  I don't think we care to fix
> that either, but we technically could of course.  For amd64 the external
> toolchain with gcc 6.4 is broken at the moment but will be fixed after a
> few more MFCs.

Could you be more specific, please?

What is broken with PKRU, the gcc 6.4 build?  For kernel, or libc?
Does it work with not-so-ancient gcc?