From nobody Thu Dec 18 15:41:12 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkg@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4dXFJC4B47z6LCRR for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4dXFJB637Pz3jrX for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm1 header.b=uH+1QaoC; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b="bR/O4HdI"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.157 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39D3140003F for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:41:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:41:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1766072474; x=1766158874; bh=DD7GYwOqrX OQOMwaC0cVarkip1HLJYPdbgo33W3hj50=; b=uH+1QaoCIDNyRIGWMJ0rUp34Z/ +dr+j0Q8YSppcy+Wdjzze/4vuWN0AxUVv7jOMI8fNJpC98kJ1QJLYq/LIxUfB1+w JvKwD7Zf74CpCtmPtfwrtUUBxY0utLnUynBbE6z3GiLxQvVkxA/A9dVcYnKxML40 Mg4s1pblAueBCPXjKAW4/wk+3polyRY9jaaCzyzRHABgY+sZEE8eXFRRyce3FIK+ LdOlhpECtgGdlitZdlixaoPV4g7ca4C8eOszrUQC2LhL/Z6yHUq4Ewl+LNEIAfDx y59Awg7TVgbCr2ExLGVn+3igjGNViR3jrLS7WuwzMLlaEfeZvMOqL+kqOlTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1766072474; x=1766158874; bh=DD7GYwOqrXOQOMwaC0cVarkip1HLJYPdbgo 33W3hj50=; b=bR/O4HdIYNLu0NweYkyxxvmCwiUCuNRWia/AJ6TnYTsBDUKPA04 frLpmp5G5U+f2JlqJQdNcDZy3vi41Ww6Q3F/KZFZdQ1Z6E3oqNSZBlDj/93rqVWC OddfPIf4FZOmVM+23BGREbu1SUQk30Y7EuanGnS3JtDhSbeOKvANQMUVfzn8f1Ff B6SOfqRWRscH30nmo5I090gpQ2mPFf6S93g8tNN73cquIz/jqLoigJvk4gEV2kwU XOxaNHHAX2QdCLedMMtD0773N3Wu2fXVwwmuleh9wE/+lsAIykorXrgF2g8w2Z9H o6E7y8JDMrZjK4SRLDkVQ6XuVR/rSgrRjtQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdegheekudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgv rhhnpedthfehueetjeduffekhfdthfefkeegtddvieetvefgjedtgfeffffhueeiledtie enucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmpdhnsggprhgtph htthhopedupdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehfrhgvvggsshguqdhp khhgsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 10:41:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 15:41:12 +0000 From: void To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere complains of duplicate dependencies when processing portslist [known 10 day or so bad status of ports tree] Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.157:from]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4dXFJB637Pz3jrX On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:36:12PM +0000, void wrote: >On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 07:26:36AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > >>Note: >> >>729666 does not seem to be a commit hash prefix from the main >>branch. It is not handy to figure out what commit corresponds >>to a "--first-parent --count for merge-base" number, if that >>is what it is. dev-commits-ports-main and the likes of >>https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/log/ are not set up for lookups >>based on such. If it is such a number, an "n" prefix might be >>appropriate. > >Hi, yeah it's n. > >% doas git -C /usr/ports rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD >729666 > >% doas git -C /usr/ports log -n 1 HEAD | egrep commit >commit 271f3fe6c9e633af2d11f4412ad85c8377bc2d10 Or, more informative and human-readable-at-a-glance, and what I should have written in the first place: % doas git -C /usr/ports log -n 1 HEAD | egrep -e commit -e Date commit 271f3fe6c9e633af2d11f4412ad85c8377bc2d10 Date: Thu Dec 18 15:28:54 2025 +0100 --