From owner-freebsd-net Mon Mar 19 23:34:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7196837B718 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:34:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2K7XgL24636; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:33:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:33:42 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: ravi prasad Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP processes Message-ID: <20010319233342.J29888@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010320064911.21557.qmail@nwcst286.netaddress.usa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010320064911.21557.qmail@nwcst286.netaddress.usa.net>; from raprasad@usa.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:49:11PM -0700 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * ravi prasad [010319 22:49] wrote: > Dear Sir, > I found that the packets to be sent are queued in a interface queue by the > ipv6_output function if the interface is busy. My doubt is whether the packets > are sent through the interfaces by separate processes. They are sent later by a timeout routine that drains the queue into the driver. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message