From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 21 16:39:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA29957 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 16:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA29951 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 16:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA06885; Thu, 21 Mar 1996 16:38:06 -0800 Message-Id: <199603220038.QAA06885@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: JULIAN Elischer , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEVFS vs "regular /dev" In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Mar 1996 15:13:41 EST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 16:38:05 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Thu, 21 Mar 1996, JULIAN Elischer wrote: > >> well, not quite.. >> because init tries to open some devices before the fstab is used to mount the >> disks and devfs.. >> >> you could always alter init to directly mount /dev.... > > Okay, added to my list of "things to do" Or you could alter the kernel to directly mount /dev. Another reason I'm pushing for this model is that I don't like the idea that the "init" program, which may not be /sbin/init, has to know about this - we'd also have to modify sysinstall, for example. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project