From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Nov 11 15:22:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA02781 for mobile-outgoing; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 15:22:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (SRI-56K-FR.mt.net [206.127.65.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA02774 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 15:22:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04403; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 16:21:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA19163; Tue, 11 Nov 1997 16:21:53 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 16:21:53 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199711112321.QAA19163@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: John-Mark Gurney Cc: Nate Williams , FreeBSD Mobile Subject: Re: interesting pcmcia card behavior... In-Reply-To: <19971111150752.17683@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> References: <19971111131657.37693@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> <199711112145.OAA18382@rocky.mt.sri.com> <19971111140322.45272@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> <199711112226.PAA18604@rocky.mt.sri.com> <19971111144122.11882@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> <199711112245.PAA18757@rocky.mt.sri.com> <19971111145830.52911@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> <199711112304.QAA18927@rocky.mt.sri.com> <19971111150752.17683@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > if I enable the sysctl, it works fine the first time that I insert the > > > card after removing it durning suspend... > > > > > > > if I disable the sysctl, it will come up if I instert it a second time > > > after removing the card during a suspend... > > > > Ahh, OK. I'm suprised that it makes any difference since by the time > > the machine is 'up' the sysctl shouldn't do a whole lot. > > oh... the enable/disable state of the sysctl is then state when the > system comes out of suspend mode w/o the card... Yeah, that's true. I'm a little out of it today, due to many phone calls and lots of questions being asked in email and in person, so I'll have to sit back and think about things when my brain gets some spare cycles. Sorry for the confusion. Nate