From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 20:17:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F97B106566B for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A442E8FC13 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so1825802fxm.13 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:16:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:organization:to:subject :date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=iDV5vL/74hoMJVjPlzCS5aTqyDDCHa1T1SF2XvFSPas=; b=lfu637gcEuU4Uih7vsGCPDG3Sf1m/2rORJdNLWknMa0n8dc61xllFi5eOvKDpAccYL 3iDYuFt0hE0CcuMYYcIRD8rqk0OaGC28/op12MKuvfQPUE5Sd8UFEAWHYIiAd87ITLEG ey214R/uETsTfsi4jG/p8Gnx/aEVEjPAktnLA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; b=HaY9oBdxvdKSvDEPAe2opP03BlOEzCMr9J79meq2HWp2o7+Ik7pzY7IOsoH5l554zz Jd4ZKUdWeFqkxr970T68CMpbn6sckHfxyQJgBjWQaKVaVLoBYSNwt3DIpztwynPsPRUA DG4O/e12Vv0hHEDpxCiwJTFPOfI3xrGhqekBQ= Received: by 10.223.119.135 with SMTP id z7mr10129faq.29.1278015417098; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-24-150.dsl.mweb.co.za [41.132.24.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm53979695fal.47.2010.07.01.13.16.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:16:38 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor Organization: Private To: xorquewasp@googlemail.com Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 22:16:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.4.3; amd64; ; ) References: <20100624121141.GA40498@logik.internal.network> <20100701120006.GA28132@logik.internal.network> In-Reply-To: <20100701120006.GA28132@logik.internal.network> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1656207.VEjKAHSLTp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007012216.30638.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Mikle Krutov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 wine on amd64 - DRI a lost cause? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:17:05 -0000 --nextPart1656207.VEjKAHSLTp Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 01 July 2010 14:00:06 xorquewasp@googlemail.com wrote: > On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote: > > Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail? > > May be that's the source of the problem. > > For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other > >=20 > > program, some 32bit libs were in lib32, and so on. >=20 > As mentioned, I've tried it in a jail, a plain chroot and also completely > unchrooted and unjailed. >=20 > Wine itself works fine but DRI doesn't. >=20 > I recently wrote to freebsd-hackers@ and the response wasn't exactly > positive. Seems 32-bit DRI is basically expected to fail when talking > to a 64-bit kernel. Wine's not the one at fault here. Have you tried the packages from http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/wine/ They worked for me with nvidia and intel. =20 Regards, David --nextPart1656207.VEjKAHSLTp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkws954ACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKX5wCfWiKgNSq0i1IIBIQV9Wpsq/r5 J9oAnRt5Q843GipJAJ3BimTmRQuYkpky =DI4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1656207.VEjKAHSLTp--