From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 19:39:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBEE16A4B3; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6A04400F; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:39:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8U2dAAD083646; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:39:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:39:12 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030929.203912.32174985.imp@bsdimp.com> To: brooks@one-eyed-alien.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030930010128.GA31222@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20030930010128.GA31222@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing the if.h/if_var.h split X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:39:13 -0000 In message: <20030930010128.GA31222@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Brooks Davis writes: : Six years and eight months ago, net/if.h was split into if.h and : if_var.h. At the time, if_var.h was included at the end if if.h as : follows (this is the current code, but it's equivalent): ... : Does this sound reasonable? I'd go ahead and finish the split. Warner