From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Aug 20 1: 4:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A083F151E2 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 01:04:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from mail.scc.nl (i136.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.112.97]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22757 from for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 10:03:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA49598 for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:46:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by scones.sup.scc.nl with netnews for emulation@FreeBSD.ORG (emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) To: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:46:12 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <37BD07C4.89ECB80D@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: , <199908200147.SAA09372@dingo.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: Any Lotus Notes success stories? Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Smith wrote: > Run the scripts inside a Linux shell; this should get the right uname > binary. I have a sneaking suspicion that at the moment there's an > issue in that a Linux-mode shell calling exec() on a #! binary will get > a FreeBSD-mode interpreter, but you can work around that by sourcing > the script directly. Your suspicion is founded. That is exactly what happens. It's already on my agenda (I don't have an exclusive on the matter, mind you :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message