From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 12:27:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F8F1065670 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F738FC12 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nq3y3-0003MF-To for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:27:51 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:27:51 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:27:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:27:38 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <20100312122559.GU8200@hoeg.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100118 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <20100312122559.GU8200@hoeg.nl> Subject: Re: likely and unlikely X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:27:53 -0000 On 03/12/10 13:26, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > * Ivan Voras wrote: >> Wouldn't it be more convenient to have a single global definition of >> them, under #ifdef __GNUC__ for example in sys/stddef.h ? > > Wouldn't it be better to have them in sys/cdefs.h? Yes, I think you're right.