From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 13 14:21:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED2A16A41F for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8C443D48 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com) Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (bne75-4-82-227-159-103.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.159.103]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7712B3FDE7 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:21:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from diversion.herbelot.nom (diversion.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.6]) by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9DELEHl021680; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:21:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Thierry Herbelot To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:21:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200510131331.27906.thierry@herbelot.com> In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Windows can lose your files X-Op-Sys: Le FriBi de la mort qui tue X-Org: TfH&Co X-MailScanner: Found to be clean MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510131621.07299.thierry@herbelot.com> Cc: Joshua Coombs Subject: Re: Loss of ed(4) in a RC1 booted in qemu X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: thierry@herbelot.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:28 -0000 Le Thursday 13 October 2005 15:38, Joshua Coombs a écrit : > Welp, while I have no real help, I can point out this was reported by > another user on the stable list, QEMU + RC1 == no ed well, I should have looked there before posting here ;-) (sorry for the excellent Michel talon at lpthe.jussieu.fr : I should have seeen your post) > I'm kinda dreading upgrading my 386... I'll pull down the generic > kernel and do a test boot to see if it's a QEMU thing or a reguression > in RC1 for me, it's definitely a qemu thing : I have two other machines upgraded to 6.0 post-RC1, and both are working *fine* ; moreover one is a notebook with a pcmcia ed(4), and this NIC works perfectly (the issue is therefore seen only on qemu) TfH