From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 1 17:22:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28552 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 17:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seagull.rtd.com (seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA28545; Thu, 1 May 1997 17:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA03951; Thu, 1 May 1997 17:22:22 -0700 (MST) From: Don Yuniskis Message-Id: <199705020022.RAA03951@seagull.rtd.com> Subject: Re: SPAM target To: chuckr@mat.net (Chuck Robey) Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 17:22:22 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Chuck Robey" at May 1, 97 06:53:40 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Apparently this sleaze is using our mailing lists as a target (I just got > 3 of them): > >> Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 15:38:53 PDT >> From: rich@vegasone.com >> Subject: Add LIVE Girls to your website! > > This guy is PRIME material for the kill list, right? Why not just subscribe him, postmaster@vegasone.com, et al. to -hackers, -questions, etc. and let him deal with *our* mail load! (sigh) I've asked previously why each list doesn't require the originators of posts to also subscribe to the list (and received sensible answers). Perhaps it might be time to start changing that policy?? --don