From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 17 7: 2:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E1837B401 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from sima.sita.kiev.ua (sima.sita.kiev.ua [193.193.223.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A9743EE6 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:02:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ay@sita.kiev.ua) Received: (from ay@localhost) by sima.sita.kiev.ua (8.Who.Cares/8.Who.Cares) id gBHF2MN85548; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:02:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ay) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:02:22 +0200 (EET) Message-Id: <200212171502.gBHF2MN85548@sima.sita.kiev.ua> From: ay@sita.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Organization: SitaNet User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-RELEASE (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <20021217022222.GA42831@kzsu.stanford.edu.lucky.freebsd.questions> you wrote: > Hey, one of my acquaintences is running a 2.2.8-STABLE box > which had 1048 days of uptime as of 32 days ago. I bet it's > still up... :) Is it ok to still run this security hole called 2.2.* ? :) -- AY7-UANIC || AY15-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message