From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 18 00:38:17 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E76DF37B401; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 626BC43F3F; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA29591;
	Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:38:14 +1000
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:38:12 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030718064120.GA72366@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
Message-ID: <20030718173517.D22235@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <20030718064120.GA72366@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NFS ftruncate patch for review
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 07:38:18 -0000

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Robbins wrote:

> Any comments on this patch? The referenced PR contains more comments and a
> test program. It's not obvious from the diff, but the changes are to
> nfs_setattr() in the va_size != VNOVAL && v_type == VREG case.

Good work.  I've thought that the PR (41792) was quite serious since it
was submitted.

BTW, what stopped PRs being mailed to the "normal" lists?  freebsd-bugs is
normal I think.

Bruce