From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 14 20:28:17 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E280416A474;
	Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:28:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jasone@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from lh.synack.net (lh.synack.net [204.152.188.37])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BDD43D5C;
	Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:28:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jasone@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by lh.synack.net (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 632815E4926; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.150.128] (unknown [64.126.143.99])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lh.synack.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B833C5E4909;
	Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4490713E.2050107@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:27:42 -0700
From: Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.4.1 (X11/20060420)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
References: <448FC3AF.9060606@bulinfo.net> <449048C7.6090109@FreeBSD.org>
	<20060614175352.GI28128@groat.ugcs.caltech.edu>
	<200606141358.47527.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<20060614184026.GC86300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20060614184026.GC86300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.6 (2005-12-07) on lh.synack.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed 
	version=3.0.6
Cc: Krassimir Slavchev <krassi@bulinfo.net>,
	Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: memory leak in free()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:28:18 -0000

Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:58:46PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>And any such patch would have to have a knob that defaulted to keeping
>>overcommit on anyway. :-)
> 
> Ha ! Exactly. My patch has such knob :).
> Shameless plug: http://kostikbel.narod.ru/overcommit
> 
> Testing the patch on recent CURRENT, I did notice that jemalloc
> really likes the swap :).

You're saying that jemalloc uses a lot of *reserved* swap space, right? 
  That's different than actually causing a lot of swapping, and 
something that is of no concern, IMO.

Jason