From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Aug 21 15:26:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72579BF86E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9825AF3D; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.156.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t7LFQPTL048100 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:26:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Mellanox 40Gb support To: aurfalien References: <39463A45-148F-431E-9C75-87952B27033A@gmail.com> <55D741FE.3090009@freebsd.org> Cc: "K. Macy" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <55D7431C.4010502@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 23:26:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:26:36 -0000 On 8/21/15 11:24 PM, aurfalien wrote: > Hi, > > Well, this is all in a test env of course, but I’m planning to use head. > > What are your thoughts? My curiosity was as to whether you hook this into the current NFS or whether it's so different that it's almost a new implementation..? > > - aurf > > "Janitorial Services" > > On Aug 21, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Julian Elischer > wrote: > >> On 8/21/15 10:29 PM, aurfalien wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks very much for the response. >>> >>> Well, I’m implementing NFSoRDMA and as a best practices, Mellanox >>> suggested I use the very latest drivers. >>> >>> >> really? >> On FreeBSD? >> Is this a fresh implementation of NFS or using the NFS in head? >> >