From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jun 25 08:42:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA29133 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bagpuss.visint.co.uk (bagpuss.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA29115; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 08:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by bagpuss.visint.co.uk (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA00227; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:41:59 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 16:41:59 +0100 (BST) From: Stephen Roome To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Greg Lehey , David Nugent , FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: OS/2 users going to FreeBSD? :-) In-Reply-To: <21712.867251075@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > *Insert Gum Shield* > > M$ Windows does have good documentation though, perhaps due to people > > being paid to do it, or because there's a lot of people who can't write M$ > > Windows software but want to get it in on it. > > I think it's the paid part which does it. Happily, I'm now > interviewing for a paid writer's position now so that this component > of the problem can be dealt with. Actually I was expecting someone to flame me for saying that M$ Windows has better docs than FreeBSD, which isn't entirely true but... Eagerly awating documentation... ;) Hope (s)he's good. Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/