Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:13:22 +0100 (CET) From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-go@freebsd.org Subject: Mk/Uses/go.mk: TEST_ENV is not passed to test build Message-ID: <2089837519.5773.1737724402470@localhost>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
------=_Part_5772_1200877634.1737724402466 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, According to bsd.port.mk TEST_ENV is passed as environment to the default make test target. I tried that in my databases/mongodb-tools port and it didn't work. A small diff fixes this. diff --git a/Mk/Uses/go.mk b/Mk/Uses/go.mk index d7e932daee73..2a4ff76db199 100644 --- a/Mk/Uses/go.mk +++ b/Mk/Uses/go.mk @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ do-test: (cd ${GO_WRKSRC}; \ for t in ${GO_TESTTARGET}; do \ ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Testing $${t}"; \ - ${SETENVI} ${WRK_ENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${GO_ENV} GOPROXY=off ${GO_CMD} test ${GO_TESTFLAGS} $${t}; \ + ${SETENVI} ${WRK_ENV} ${TEST_ENV} ${GO_ENV} GOPROXY=off ${GO_CMD} test ${GO_TESTFLAGS} $${t}; \ done) . endif Just a question. In bsd.port.mk the line TEST_ENV?=${MAKE_ENV} copies MAKE_ENV into TEST_ENV, unless you set TEST_ENV yourself in the ports Makefile. 1. Should I replace MAKE_ENV with TEST_ENV in go.mk (see diff above)? This looks like how cmake.mk, perl5.mk and python.mk pass TEST_ENV. This might break the test target in existing ports which do no add MAKE_ENV to TEST_ENV themselves. 2. Or should I add TEST_ENV to the line above together with MAKE_ENV which might duplicate the env variables because TEST_ENV=MAKE_ENV in bsd.port.mk? I would prefer 1 and document the change in /usr/ports/CHANGES as it is more in line with the other languages. What do you think? Regards, Ronald. ------=_Part_5772_1200877634.1737724402466 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head></head><body>Hi,<br> <br> According to bsd.port.mk TEST_ENV is passed as environment to the default make test target.<br> I tried that in my databases/mongodb-tools port and it didn't work.<br> <br> A small diff fixes this. <pre>diff --git a/Mk/Uses/go.mk b/Mk/Uses/go.mk index d7e932daee73..2a4ff76db199 100644 --- a/Mk/Uses/go.mk +++ b/Mk/Uses/go.mk @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ do-test: (cd ${GO_WRKSRC}; \ for t in ${GO_TESTTARGET}; do \ ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Testing $${t}"; \ - ${SETENVI} ${WRK_ENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${GO_ENV} GOPROXY=off ${GO_CMD} test ${GO_TESTFLAGS} $${t}; \ + ${SETENVI} ${WRK_ENV} ${TEST_ENV} ${GO_ENV} GOPROXY=off ${GO_CMD} test ${GO_TESTFLAGS} $${t}; \ done) . endif</pre> <br> <br> Just a question.<br> In bsd.port.mk the line TEST_ENV?=${MAKE_ENV} copies MAKE_ENV into TEST_ENV, unless you set TEST_ENV yourself in the ports Makefile.<br> <br> 1. Should I replace MAKE_ENV with TEST_ENV in go.mk (see diff above)? This looks like how cmake.mk, perl5.mk and python.mk pass TEST_ENV. This might break the test target in existing ports which do no add MAKE_ENV to TEST_ENV themselves.<br> 2. Or should I add TEST_ENV to the line above together with MAKE_ENV which might duplicate the env variables because TEST_ENV=MAKE_ENV in bsd.port.mk?<br> <br> I would prefer 1 and document the change in /usr/ports/CHANGES as it is more in line with the other languages.<br> <br> What do you think?<br> <br> Regards,<br> Ronald.<br> </body></html> ------=_Part_5772_1200877634.1737724402466--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2089837519.5773.1737724402470>